The Pathed Non-Threaded (PNT) Scheduling Model
- In this video, we're going to explain the Path Non-Threaded or PNT scheduling model.
- What is PNT?
- Path non-thread is a scheduling that allows shippers to nominate a transportation path for their gas from receipt to delivery.
- Southern Star uses this path and associated shipper-defined rankings to schedule gas on the pipe accordingly.
- southern star previously used the non path scheduling.
- shippers nominated receipts and deliveries as a total.
- Southern Star then used a pro rata method to schedule gas on the pipe.
- Priority of service is the first scheduling priority in both models.
- However, the differences between shipper-defined rankings versus transportation provider pro-rata designation.
- Also, P&T model gives shippers flexibility and control through the use of path nominations and rankings.
- There were challenges posed by the non-PATH scheduling model.
- Specific markets and supply were not directly tied together, which made it difficult for Southern Star to follow contractual rights through constraints.
- The use of the PATH nonthreaded model allows us to more easily follow not only contractal rights, through constraint areas,
- but it allows the shipper to proactively protect their nominations by utilizing ranks.
- Non-path scheduling models was also inconsistent with the industry.
- With most of the industry's pipelines using the path non-threaded model, existing and new shippers on Southern Star system will be more familiar with this model.
- On the non path scheduling model confirmations were made at a specific shipper and contract level.
- This dictated to the shippor which contracts would be scheduled for flow.
- P&T confirmation are made in an aggregate shiper level without the need to detail specific contracts.
- This allows Southern Star to use shipperset rankings to schedule the gas.
- This slide gives an example of a non-passed model nomination and a PNT model domination.
- Assuming that a shipper's contract has a 10,000 maximum daily quantity with two receipt locations scheduled at 5,00 each for a total of 10 thousand,
- and three different delivery locations on the same contract scheduled for $10,000. In the event of a curtailment or a cut,
- say, maybe receipt location A's $5,00 gets cut to zero, the contract would need to be balanced.
- Without rankings or an identified path tying the receipts to the deliveries, that $5000 cut would have been pro rata along all three delivery This may
- not have been the intent of the shipper.
- To more accurately gather the intents of shippers, the P&T model gives a demonstration of same contract of 10,000 decotherms,
- same receipt locations and delivery location quantities, but in addition to the receipt and the delivery nominations, a PATH nomination is now provided
- that has specific receipt location to specific delivery locations and gives the shipper the opportunity to rank those.
- So in the event of a cut on either the upstream or the downstream side, it is clear to Southern Star the intent of the shipers and we can easily make the
- appropriate cuts.
- Instructions on how to place specific transaction type nominations can be found under scheduling resources in a CSI resource library.
Was this resource helpful?
Thanks for your feedback.